Politics

Rivers rerun: Riggers will be treated as political armed robbers – Wike

Ahead of the forthcoming rerun elections in Rivers State, the state governor, Chief Nyesom Wike has warned against any malpractices saying any election rigger would be treated as a political armed robber.

The governor who was speaking on a radio programme in Port Harcourt at the weekend declared that the forthcoming legislative rerun elections in the state would be a test of the preparedness of the current Federal Government effort allow for the deepening of democracy.

According to him, the Supreme Court upheld his election  on the premise of laid down legal principles applied in all the other governorship appeals , saying that no action  was taken to influence  the  judgment  as alleged by the Rivers APC.

The governor warned that the people of Rivers State would not allow the planned use of security agencies to rig the elections to materialise.

According to him, the desperation to rig the forthcoming rerun elections is part of a plot by the APC to capture Rivers State through fraudulent means as they have arranged to write results and go ahead with an impeachment plan.

His words: “They are so desperate to rig the elections. These elections will be a test for democracy in Nigeria”.

The governor  said  that  contrary  to  claims by the APC,  he is not involved  in inciting violence  as the warning  he gave that those who plan to rig the rerun elections  will be  treated as political armed robbers is in line with similar warnings  given by President  Muhammadu Buhari before the last general elections.

“If they are coming to do proper elections to let the will of the people to prevail, we will support them. Why are they worried simply because we are fighting political armed robbers”, he said.

On the issue  of  the  Supreme Court judgment which validated his election,  Wike said that just like in other governorship  elections,  the Court held that the Card reader  was not superior to  the  voter register  in the accreditation  process. He added that the Supreme Court also held that he was not given fair hearing because the second chairman of the Rivers State Governorship Tribunal passed a judgment in a motion that he did not hear.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply