First generation telecom investors’ foot drags on colocation-ATCON

The Association of Telecommunications Companies of Nigeria (ATCON) have disclosed why the first generation telecom investors might be foot-dragging on the approach for the industry’s stakeholder’s clamour for colocation as the solution to overcoming infrastructure deficit among telecoms operators.

Mr. Olusola Teniola, ATCON’s President, who made the assertion during ATCON’s AGM recently, stated that there is indeed industry’s stakeholder’s clamour for colocation, adding that the appetite for infrastructure sharing is there but not without few bottlenecks.

He recounted the unavailability of enough infrastructures which has remained a recurring concern and clog on the wheels of services delivery in the industry.

Teniola recommended that some of the terms and conditions under colocation agreements should be reviewed, while favourable operating environment must be provided to encourage infrastructure deployment.

“We have always said that the numbers of base stations are not enough for the country’s population and for the coverage needed. We have been projecting about 50,000 base stations are needed, and we have heard the Executive Vice Chairman of the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) even targeting 70,000.

“It means the numbers are improving, because as at 2012, the industry was targeting 50,000. And we are on less than 25,000 which is a far cry from the expected infrastructure. With that limited infrastructure, it is difficult to have pure co-location or infrastructure sharing regime. First, there is need for more infrastructure.

“Secondly, some of the terms and conditions should be reviewed, but that is not the ultimate issue here. The appetite for infrastructure sharing is there. For instance, if we need to operate in a certain State and there is only a functional tower/base station, what we need is to deploy more. That requires investment and invariably, forex. If you are not allowing that happen, what then are we going to share.

“There is maximum capacity we need to increase (infrastructure) sharing. Ensuring the enabling environment, allowing operators to import equipment will help address some of the issues in the industry at the moment”.

It makes economic sense, he said to share infrastructure (co-locate), stressing that “In some quarters, there are questions as why telcos are not expanding as should, but our argument is that we need some balance from the Government to make this happen.

“When we look at the map of Nigeria and the tele-density, there are about 235 identified market gaps. Government, through the Universal Service Provision Fund (USPF) is trying to close those gaps. Our members contribute to the fund too. Even in other climes, there are always issues of un-served and underserved.

“Obviously, those areas that are deemed as security risks need to be liberated for our members to deploy infrastructure for improved services. We have seen cases of not only property been destroyed but lives were lost.

“During Boko Haram era, for instance, base stations were destroyed. The operators affected may have programmes to rejuvenate the services as their access destroyed during the rampaging days of Boko Haram. They were cases of satellite been used to increase services availability in those areas. So, the operators are committed to rebuilding the base stations.

So, to improve or manage the security situations, they had to recruit people from the community”, he explained.