Enugu East: Chimaroke Nnamani floors Senator Nnaji in Court

Moses Oyediran, Enugu

The Federal High Court, in Enugu on Friday struck out Senator Gilbert Nnaji’s bid to upturn the ticket given to former Enugu state Governor, Senator Chimaroke Nnamani by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Nnaji, who is representing Enugu East Senatorial District had in October last year approached an Abuja Federal High Court asking that his name be submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as the PDP candidate for the senatorial district.

It would be recalled that Nnaji came fourth at the PDP primary.

He however, went to court where he claimed through his counsel, Onyinye Mbanefo, that Nnamani was not present during the screening of PDP aspirants and as such was not qualified to stand for the primary.

He further claimed that he came second in the election and was the rightful candidate.

The case was later transferred to the Enugu on the orders of the chief cudge of the Federal High Court.

Counsel to Nnamani, C Anyigbo, in his defence, among other things, told the court that the suit was statute barred, arguing that the course of action should have arisen after the PDP screening which the plaintiff (Nnaji) claimed Sen. Nnamani did not attend.

There was also drama midway into the suit as another aspirant, Mr. Chinedu Nneji indicated interest to be joined in the matter.

Nneji, who came second prayed the court that in the event of Nnamani’s disqualification, he should be declared the rightful candidate of the party.

Delivering judgement, Justice Buba Mohammed said Nnaji appeared in person to give testimony where he claimed to have come second in the PDP primary.

He however, held that having failed to institute the action within the period as provided by the law, the matter was dead.

While agreeing that the issue of jurisdiction was clearly raised by the defendant, the court held that the suit was statute barred and should be dismissed.

“Head or tail, night or day, the case of the plaintiff is statute barred; in that case, the only thing the court could do is that of dismissal.

“The plaintiff cannot cry wolf where there was none, this is a plaintiff who chose to file his case in Abuja, he started on a wrong footing, this court will not on the altar of speed, sacrifice justice.

“This court is of the firm view that the plaintiff is a speculator, sleep-walking.

From every assessment, the plaintiff cannot prove his case Issue resolved against the plaintiff, lacked merit, speculative and is hereby dismissed,” the court further ordered,” the court stated.

On the counter claims by the 5th defendant, Nneji, the judge described him as “a habitual late comer, more or less a scavenger waiting for the spoils of war.”

He accordingly dismissed his counter claims for also being statute barred.