Buying Babies? The Ethical Storm Around Surrogacy and Women’s Bodies
As the global fertility industry expands, so too does the heated debate surrounding surrogacy — a practice many hail as a scientific blessing, but others decry as a commodification of the human body. At the heart of this storm is a growing call to critically examine whether surrogacy crosses the line from reproductive assistance into a marketplace where babies are bought and women’s wombs are rented.
Once seen as a lifeline for couples facing infertility, surrogacy has morphed into a multibillion-dollar industry with complex legal, ethical, and emotional implications. While some women volunteer their wombs out of compassion, a growing number are doing so under economic duress — particularly in developing countries — raising concerns about exploitation, consent, and dignity.
The Commercial Surrogacy Dilemma
Commercial surrogacy, where surrogates are paid beyond medical costs, is legal in countries like the United States, Ukraine, and Russia, but banned or heavily restricted in much of Europe and parts of Africa. In Nigeria, the practice exists in a legal gray area, often operating in the shadows and intertwined with concerns of human trafficking and child selling.
Critics argue that when money becomes the incentive, surrogacy risks turning childbirth into a transactional arrangement. “You cannot put a price tag on the body of a woman or the life of a child,” says Dr. Amaka Olumide, a gender rights advocate. “It creates a system where poverty becomes the gateway to exploitation.”
Consent or Coercion?
Proponents often frame surrogacy as a personal choice — a woman’s right to do what she wishes with her body. But in places where poverty is rampant and healthcare access is unequal, is that choice truly free?
Surrogates in low-income settings are sometimes bound by opaque contracts, denied full agency, and subjected to medical procedures with limited support. There have even been reports of surrogates being pressured to undergo abortions or c-sections at the directive of commissioning parents.
READ ALSO: From Freetown to Abuja: Bio Charts Bold Vision as ECOWAS Chair
“The language of ‘choice’ rings hollow when survival is on the table,” says Ifeoma Nweke, a legal scholar who has researched surrogacy laws in West Africa. “It is not empowerment when it’s fueled by desperation.”
Redefining Parenthood
The rise of surrogacy also forces society to grapple with fundamental questions: Is parenthood a biological connection, a legal contract, or an emotional bond? And does wealth now determine who gets to be a parent?
Surrogacy arrangements are increasingly being pursued by wealthy individuals, celebrities, and international clients, creating an imbalance that critics say turns children into commodities. This power dynamic, where one person pays and the other produces, has raised moral alarms globally.
Toward Ethical Reform
As demand grows, experts are calling for stricter regulations to protect all parties involved — especially the surrogate mothers. This includes legal frameworks that emphasize informed consent, medical oversight, fair compensation without coercion, and psychological support before and after birth.
“We’re not saying surrogacy should be banned outright,” notes Dr. Chukwuemeka Eze of the African Institute for Bioethics. “But it must not become a Wild West where women’s bodies are the frontier.”
Conclusion
At its best, surrogacy offers hope, connection, and the gift of life. But at its worst, it teeters into a dangerous trade-off where human dignity is sacrificed for profit. As the world wrestles with the future of fertility, one thing is clear: women’s bodies must never be reduced to rented spaces, and children must never become items on a transactional checklist.
