Counsel to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) at the Nasarawa Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, Mr. KANU Agabi SAN, has slammed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for what he described as the inability of the electoral body to defend the declaration of Governor Abdullahi Sule of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as winner of the last governorship election in the state.
While hinging its petition on irregularities and infractions during the election, the PDP counsel said failure of INEC to deny identified electoral infractions and fraud recorded is enough not to have declared the APC candidate as winner.
During the adoption of written addresses, Agabi indicated that INEC accepted wrongdoing when the defense lawyer, Ishiaku Dikko, SAN acknowledged that both the APC and Governor Sule were also shortchanged during the March 18 governorship election.
He said that INEC failed to defend the victory it declared as the Commission hinged its claims on the ambiguity of collated figures while ignoring INEC records, arguing that their client was also rigged of their votes by INEC at other polling units different from the ones under contention by the petitioners.
“With INEC having concluded its final address on a quote “what is good for the goose is good for the gander,”To this, Counsel to the Petitioners opined that the INEC is positioning to be both “goose and gander.”
The PDP and it’s candidate, Davesmatuc Ombugadu are challenging the results of several electoral wards, including Gayam, Ciroma, Azara, Kanje/Abuni, Ashige, and more, citing inflation of votes in favor of the 2nd and 3rd respondents, as well as wrongful vote cancellations.
To support their case, the petitioners presented evidence from all agents in the disputed wards and copies of Form EC8A (Polling Unit Results) obtained from INEC, as well as duplicate copies issued to party agents.
Based on the polling unit results before the tribunal, Hon. David Emmanuel Ombugadu emerges as the victor in the last gubernatorial election in Nasarawa State.
READ ALSO: Health Workers’ Union lauds Tinubu for approving
The petitioners argue that the Form EC8B, D, and E presented by the respondents differ from the foundational sources of election data, including Form EC8A series, BVAS Machines Reports, and CTC IRev Portal Reports.
According to sources, the ongoing controversy raises significant questions about the integrity of the election process in Nasarawa State, as the tribunal continues to assess the evidence presented by both parties members of the public are waiting for the verdict of the tribunal.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.