Dutch court orders Shell Nigeria to compensate farmers for oil spills

Andrew Orolua, Abuja & Aherhoke Okioma,Yenagoa

Environmentalists and Nigerian farmers recorded another legal victory against an oil company on Friday.

The Dutch Appeal Court ordered energy giant Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary to compensate farmers in two villages for damage to their land caused by oil spillage in 2004 and 2005.

The Dutch Appeal Court held that the Nigerian subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell, that is Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC ) was responsible for oil pipeline leaks in the Niger Delta and ordered it to pay unspecified damages to farmers.

The Hague Court of Appeal held Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary liable for two leaks that spewed oil over an area of a total of about 60 football pitches (soccer fields) in two villages, saying that it could not be established “beyond a reasonable doubt” that saboteurs were to blame.

Under Nigerian law, which was applied in the Dutch civil case, the company is not liable if the leaks were the result of sabotage.

The Hague appeals court discountenanced the argument of the oil giant that sabotage was to blame for an oil leak in another village; however, it said that the issue of whether Shell can be held liable “remains open” and the case will be continued as the court wants clarification about the extent of the pollution and whether it still has to be cleaned up.

READ ALSO: Fishermen report another oil spill at Chevron’s Funiwa oilfield off Bayelsa coastline

The court also ruled that Dutch-based mother company Royal Dutch Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary must fix a leak-detection system to a pipeline that caused one of the spills.

The amount of compensation paid to three farmers in the villages will be established at a later date.

The decision, which can be appealed to the Dutch Supreme Court, is the latest stage in a case that is breaking new legal ground in how far multinationals in the Netherlands can be held responsible for actions of their overseas subsidiaries.

The decision went a step further than a 2013 ruling by a lower court, saying that Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary was responsible for multiple cases of oil pollution.

Just last month the Supreme Court of Nigeria in another oil spills judgment awarded a damage of N182bn being the accumulated sum from a suit by some communities in Ogoni land for oil spillage and damage to farm land.

The Dutch appeal decision which is entirely a different matter arose from a suit filed by one of the farmers Eric Dooh and ‘Friends of the Earth’ whose Netherlands director Donald Pols hailed the ruling as a victory for small communities hurt by huge companies.

According to him, “up until this morning, Dutch multinationals could act with impunity in developing countries … and this has changed now,” Pols said.

“From this moment onwards, Dutch multinationals will be held accountable for their activities and their actions in developing countries. And that’s an enormous victory for the rights of law globally.”

Reacting to the ruling, one of the farmers involved in the case, Eric Dooh, called the decision a victory “for the entire Niger Delta region. The victory is for the Ogoni people. Victory for all that stood by our side, both Blacks and whites.”

In a written reaction, Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited expressed disappointment, saying it continued to believe that sabotage caused the spills in the villages of Oruma and Goi.

“Sabotage, crude oil theft and illegal refining are a major challenge in the Niger Delta,” the company said. “Indeed, in 2019 around 95% of spill incidents from our operations there were due to such criminal acts. Regardless of cause, we clean up and remediate, as we have done with the spills in this case.”

The Nigerian subsidiary added: “Like all Shell-operated ventures globally, we are committed to operating safely and protecting the local environment.”

In 2013, The Hague District Court ordered Shell Nigeria to compensate one of the four farmers involved in the case for making it too easy for saboteurs to open a well head that leaked onto his land.

However, the court cleared Shell of blame in pollution of the other three farmers’ land and ruled that Shell’s Dutch parent company could not be held liable.

Both sides appealed, and judges ruled in 2015 that Shell could be held to account in Dutch courts for its actions in Nigeria.

The judges also ordered Shell to give the plaintiffs access to documents that could shed more light on the cause of the leaks and how much Shell management knew about them.

Shell discovered and started exploiting Nigeria’s vast oil reserves in the late 1950s and has faced heavy criticism from activists and local communities over spills and for the company’s close ties to government security forces.

Friends of the Earth lawyers told the court that that leaking pipes are caused by poor maintenance and inadequate security and that Shell does not do enough to clean up spills.

“Tears of joy here. After 13 years, we’ve won,” the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth tweeted immediately after the decision was read out in court.

Meanwhile, the Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth, Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) has applauded the decision of a Dutch Court of Appeal in favour four Bayelsa farmers impacted by oil spills.

In a reaction to the judgement, Mr Chima Williams, Executive Director at ERA/FoEN said the verdict was a relief to the environmental rights movement .

“Today’s decisions will determine whether or not transnational companies will be obliged to respond in a swift and positive way when environmental complaints are made from their host country.

“This case has taken so long that two claimants are no longer alive. But the problems caused by the immense oil spill from Shell’s pipelines have still not been resolved after 13 years. It hurts that this can happen.

“The court has set a new standard that will give hope to ordinary citizens that no matter how powerful a company is, there will always be a day of reckoning.” Chima said.

Meanwhile Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) said it was disappointed by the verdict insisting that the incident in question was caused by sabotage.

Mr Bamidele Odugbesan, Media Relations Manager of SPDC said in a statement on Friday that most leaks from its operations were caused by vandals.

“We continue to believe that the spills in Oruma and Goi were the result of sabotage. We are therefore disappointed that this court has made a different finding on the cause of these spills and in its finding that SPDC is liable.

“Sabotage, crude oil theft and illegal refining are a major challenge in the Niger Delta. Indeed, in 2019 around 95% of spill incidents from our operations there were due to such criminal acts. Regardless of cause, we clean up and remediate, as we have done with the spills in this case.

“SPDC also works with a range of stakeholders to find solutions to these complex issues. Like all Shell-operated ventures globally, we are committed to operating safely and protecting the local environment.” Odugbesan said.