Bwala’s remarks and Tinubu camp’s anxiety over Atiku’s coalition Surge

By Dooyum Naadzenga

In a recent television interview, Daniel Bwala, Special Adviser to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, made disparaging remarks about former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

This incident unfolds against the backdrop of an evolving political landscape in Nigeria, marked by the resurgence of Atiku’s coalition aimed at challenging the ruling party’s grip on power.

While Bwala’s comments reveal deeper currents of anxiety within the Tinubu camp as they confront the potential threat posed by Atiku’s renewed political momentum. Bwala’s critique of Atiku is noteworthy not only for its content but also for the irony embedded within it.

Once a spokesperson for Atiku’s 2023 presidential campaign, Bwala’s transition to the Tinubu administration encapsulates the shifting allegiances that characterize Nigerian politics. His remarks were laden with a tone that suggested desperation—an attempt to undermine a political figure who has historically been a formidable opponent.

READ ALSO: NSF2025: Gov Diri Receives National Sports Festival Torch of Unity

The Atiku Media Office responded sharply, highlighting Bwala’s past and framing his comments as an act of political opportunism. This response underscores a broader narrative in Nigerian politics where former allies can quickly become adversaries, often driven by personal ambition rather than ideological conviction.

Atiku’s coalition, which seeks to reclaim Nigeria from economic decline and democratic erosion, is gaining traction.

This resurgence is concerning for the ruling party, which has faced increasing criticism over governance issues. The fact that the Tinubu administration feels compelled to engage in a smear campaign against Atiku signals an acknowledgment of the latter’s potential to galvanize public support and unite various opposition factions.

The coalition’s emphasis on reform and institutional integrity resonates with many Nigerians disillusioned by the current administration’s failures. Atiku’s legacy as a reformer positions him as a credible alternative, which could disrupt the status quo and challenge the ruling party’s narrative.

Bwala’s remarks also touch on the theme of political legacy. The Atiku Media Office’s response emphasizes that true legacy is built on consistent principles and service to the nation, rather than transient political gains. This perspective is crucial in a political environment often mired in accusations of opportunism and betrayal. Atiku Abubakar’s historical role in Nigeria’s democratic journey since 1999 is highlighted as a testament to his commitment to the nation. His emphasis on restructuring and electoral integrity contrasts sharply with the ruling party’s current trajectory, which has been criticized for diminishing democratic norms. In this light, the Tinubu camp’s attacks on Atiku can be interpreted as a defensive mechanism, driven by fear of losing power rather than genuine political discourse.

The ruling party’s strategy appears to be one of distraction and discrediting opponents rather than addressing substantive issues facing the country. By focusing on personal attacks against Atiku, the Tinubu administration diverts attention from its governance failures, including economic instability and rising insecurity. This tactic may serve short-term political interests but risks alienating voters who are increasingly concerned about the future of Nigeria. The decision to allocate presidential platforms for these attacks suggests a coordinated effort to undermine Atiku’s influence. However, such actions may also backfire, reinforcing the perception that the ruling party is out of touch with the electorate’s needs and concerns.

As the political landscape in Nigeria evolves, the dynamics between Atiku Abubakar’s coalition and the Tinubu administration will be pivotal in shaping the future. Bwala’s outburst may be a reflection of the ruling party’s mounting panic, but it also highlights the resilience of opposition movements. Atiku’s commitment to Nigeria’s future, as articulated by his media office, suggests a determination to remain a central figure in the fight for democratic integrity and national rebuilding.

The next steps for both camps will be crucial. For Atiku, consolidating support and presenting a united front against the ruling party will be essential. For Tinubu, addressing the underlying issues within the administration while navigating internal dissent will be equally important. The interplay of these forces will ultimately determine the course of Nigeria’s political future as the country approaches new electoral challenges.