Airlines Clash With Regulator Over Fare Manipulation

Tensions within Nigeria’s aviation sector have reached a breaking point following a public confrontation between the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC). The dispute centers on an interim regulatory report alleging that domestic carriers manipulated ticket prices during the December 2025 festive season. While the FCCPC maintains its findings are evidence-driven and necessary for consumer protection, the AON has dismissed the investigation as a “flawed” intervention that threatens the survival of the industry.

Regulator Alleges Seasonal Price Gouging
The FCCPC’s Surveillance and Investigations Department launched the probe after observing dramatic spikes in airfares during the 2025 holiday rush. By comparing peak-period data with January 2026 pricing, investigators found that fares on certain routes were “materially higher” despite stability in primary cost drivers like fuel and exchange rates. In some extreme cases, the Commission reported price differences of as much as N405,000 for a single ticket between peak and post-peak windows.

Advertisement

Regulators suspect that these variations were not merely the result of market forces but may have involved deliberate inventory restrictions. Preliminary analysis suggests that airlines may have limited seat availability during high-demand periods to force prices upward. Consequently, the FCCPC has signaled that this investigation could lead to enforcement actions aimed at increasing transparency and has even hinted at extending its scrutiny to international carriers operating in Nigeria.

AON Defends Market Dynamics and Expertise
In a sharp rebuttal, AON spokesperson Prof. Obiora Okonkwo accused the FCCPC of overstepping its professional boundaries. He argued that the Commission lacks the technical expertise required to analyze the complexities of aviation economics, specifically regarding yield management and operational cost recovery. According to the AON, the regulator’s conclusions are an attempt to “play to the gallery” rather than engage with the harsh financial realities of running an airline in a volatile economy.

Advertisement

Industry stakeholders maintain that pricing is dictated by survival rather than collusion. Analysts estimate that operating a standard Boeing 737 on a domestic route costs approximately $9,000, with sustainable ticket prices needing to exceed N100,000 just to cover expenses. With fuel accounting for roughly 38% of operating costs and profit margins as thin as N8 per kilometer, operators argue that higher peak-season fares are essential to offset losses incurred during low-demand months.

The Challenge of a Deregulated Market
The conflict highlights a fundamental tension in Nigeria’s fully deregulated aviation market. Under current laws, the government does not set airfares, allowing prices to be determined by supply and demand. However, the FCCPC retains the mandate to investigate anti-competitive behavior and exploitative pricing. Carriers warn that aggressive regulatory scrutiny, if conducted without deep industry knowledge, risks destabilizing a sector already burdened by inflation, high maintenance costs, and aircraft groundings.

As the FCCPC prepares for potential further action and airlines remain steadfast in their rejection of the report, the industry faces a period of significant uncertainty. The outcome of this dispute is expected to define the future of pricing oversight in Nigeria, as the government seeks to balance the need for affordable travel with the financial viability of its domestic carriers.